In Time | Rotten Tomatoes (2024)

Audience Reviews

Audience Member The idea, but only the idea, was a good one. The film, the writing, is such utter nonsense, and that in the highest degree, with major flaws, without end. I knew there was a reason why I never watched it back then. Unbelievable garbage. Rated 0.5/5 Stars • Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 10/07/24 Full Review L. Gerardo H Excellent concept, but the delivery was somewhat poorly. Still, it's a good watch Rated 3.5/5 Stars • Rated 3.5 out of 5 stars 09/16/24 Full Review Der letzte G Die Grundidee ist spannend, die Umsetzung ist mangelhaft. Großes Manko ist vor allem, dass sich der Protagonist Will sehr unrealistisch verhält. Er scheint mit allen Gepflogenheiten der High Society bestens vertraut, obwohl er aus der Unterschicht kommt. Rated 2/5 Stars • Rated 2 out of 5 stars 09/12/24 Full Review Aaron C Loved this film, shame there's no sequels.Loved the idea we pay with time Rated 4/5 Stars • Rated 4 out of 5 stars 09/02/24 Full Review Brian O Overall, an interesting concept. However, much of the acting didn’t stick for me. It felt unnatural, cliche, forced, and a bit cringy at times. There was a lot of dialogue dumping as well. For example, “It’s not like we have a million.” “You know what, we don’t.” This was their way of saying they were going to get a million (in time), but it felt unnatural. The actors, themselves, aren’t bad. Take Cillian Murphy, for example. He recently played Oppenheimer and won an Oscar, as many know. But, sometimes, a great actor suffers from a bad script. I believe this is one of those times. Rated 2/5 Stars • Rated 2 out of 5 stars 08/25/24 Full Review Andrew K Andrew Niccol owes me two hours Rated 0.5/5 Stars • Rated 0.5 out of 5 stars 08/19/24 Full Review Read all reviews

In Time

My Rating

Read More Read Less POST RATING WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW